新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【一】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【二】
亲爱的白衣天使们：
在这个注定不平凡的2020年的春节，我代表我的家人向你们发出一声真挚的问候，你们好吗？
2020年2月2日，代表着长长久久，也正是正月初九，我们正与家人团聚，享受着合家团圆的快乐。而你们却身穿厚重的防护服，为了我们的生命与健康，奋战在抗“疫”的“战场”上，为了责任与使命，注定要打下一片江山。你们在央视上宣传最多的是“少出门，多洗手，远离病毒”，可此时，你们与病毒零距离作战。我相信，你们必定会将我们的敌人——新型冠状病毒，统统消灭。
你们真勇敢！
疫情突发，有多少位白衣天使偷偷退掉返乡的车票、机票，不顾家人的反对，冲向战场；有多少位白衣天使含泪却坚毅的挂掉一个又一个亲人的劝说电话；又有多少位白衣天使像我们的母亲一样爱自己的孩子，却无奈而又不舍的吻别！“我愿意，我报名，我请战，我带头”这短短的几个字却充满了对家人的不舍与对责任义无反顾的承担。因为你们相信，全国人民需要你们，你们义不容辞。我相信你们一定能完成使命，平安归来。
你们真坚强！
疫情急迫，你们没有丝毫的害怕与退缩，穿上防护服就成了与病魔神斗争的天使。我们心里一直为你们打气：“白衣天使，加油！”你们为了方便，把长发及腰的黑发剪短了；你们为了方便，把成人纸尿裤穿在自己身上，原因却如此简单——节约一件防护服。面对疫情，你们比谁都坚强，比谁都坚忍。戴了多日的防护镜，把漂亮的脸庞压出一道道深深的痕迹；紧紧戴着的口罩在你们脸上无情的涂鸦。
你们真美丽!
此时此刻，我想对你们说：你们是最美丽的，最可爱的，也是最坚强的。你们的坚强，让我们泪流满面；你们的坚强，给了无数人与病魔斗争的勇气和力量。正因为有你们，我们才放心。
在“战场”上，你们总是义无反顾冲在前线保护我们，也许我们并不相识，也许至今我还不知道你们的名字，但只要看到你们就仿佛看到了希望。让这场带来巨大灾难的“战斗”早日结束吧！中国，加油！
此致
敬礼！
______
2020年_____月_____日
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【三】
尊敬的白衣天使般的叔叔阿姨们：
你们好!
不知道此时此刻，对抗新冠状病毒的工作可还顺利?
2020年，这本是全面建成小康社会、全面消除贫困关键的一年，谁知新年伊始竟然爆发了一场新型瘟疫。在这场瘟疫中，有人饱受疾病的折磨，有人被隔离终日惶惶，前段时间甚至有个日本官员因为与新型冠状病毒有关的事自了，但我认为在这场浩劫中要牺牲最多的还要数你们，给患者带去生的希望的人。
先不说第一个发现疫情并及时隔离患者的女医生，也不说为了不污染防护服而全天24小时不脱下来的前线工作者们，就说说我身边的事吧!我姑姑和你们一样，也是一位医生，学的是中医。她在兄妹三个中排行第三，年纪最小，学历最高，我们全家都很喜欢她，奶奶也格外关照自己唯一的宝贝闺女。就在大年三十那天晚上，她坚定又有点怕别人知道地和妈妈商量说：“嫂子，我想去一线。”要知道19年，姑姑的情感和事业都遭到了很大的打击，在本该和家人一起毫无顾虑、快快乐乐地谈天欢笑之时，她还在想着要为抗击新冠病毒作贡献，而且还是去危险的一线!我听了之后在愕然的同时，不禁由衷地感到钦佩。
而离我更远的地方的那些白衣战士们也一样可敬。据说某个小医院因为物资紧缺，医生们不得不把一套防护服穿好长时间，没有消毒液就只能用开水给防护服消毒。仅仅是这么一个例子，已经足以体现医生们的忘我贡献了!
现如今形势严峻，很多地方的医疗条件和物资都跟不上，但是请放心，在广袤的中国土地上，已经有人们在发起一次次募捐活动，而我们这些学生虽然尚未经济独立，但是也在后方为你们加油，请一定要放心地工作，整个中国都在后方支持着你们!
我想，你们医者都是这么想的吧：自己并不重要，重要的是去治病救人;或许在这种紧要关头，就连家人对自己的关心和善意的劝阻也微不足道了，摆在你们面前的真正重要的是天下人的安危。又或者，这是你们在学医之路上逐渐养成的一种思维模式：既然是医生，那么无论怎么样都要尽最大努力去探索治病的方法吧?在这种想法面前，自己又算得了什么呢!这两种想法，无论哪一种都是极为值得尊敬的啊!你们医生，就是献出自己的白衣天使啊!
最后，我想说一句发自内心的话：“加油啊，白衣天使们!”
此致
敬礼！
______
2020年_____月_____日
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【四】
亲爱的白衣天使们：
新年快乐！
今年的春节，有很多不一样。往常的春节，我都和爷爷奶奶去杭州吃年夜饭，给亲戚拜年。但是，今年我哪儿都没去，就在外公外婆家里写作业。就算跟妈妈去公园散步，还要戴个口罩，保持1米以上的安全距离。往常的春节，妈妈都会带我去旅行，跟她的朋友聚会，可今年她天天都陪我写作业、散步，在家处理工作。往常的春节，外公都会去公园和他的朋友们喝茶打牌，但今年他每天在家上网看新闻，外婆出去给我买松糕和小点心很快就回来了。往常的春节，爸爸也不用加班。今年他就比较忙，要把韩国进口的口罩尽快送到医院。爸爸给我发来一张照片，他的同事在机场海关，穿上厚厚的防护服，戴上护目镜和手套，每天连续工作12个小时，督促每位入境乘客填写一份健康表，保障的是14亿人口的安全。
今年的春节，会有很多不一样，是因为我们每个人都在面临一个我们眼睛看不到的敌人，这是一个我们之前从来没见过的，戴着皇冠的病毒，我们叫它新型冠状病毒。
我相信，只要我们中华民族团结起来，做好防护工作，就一定可以战胜疫情！我希望你们能快点战胜疫情，平安回家！
等冬天过去，春暖花开的时候，我们就又可以在大自然的怀抱中快乐嬉戏啦！
此致
敬礼！
______
2020年_____月_____日
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【五】
有这样一群人，他们手持手术刀，身披白大褂，为了更好的抗击疾病，女性舍了青丝，他们全天24小时轮流值班，一天坚持20多个小时戴口罩，已经持续了3个多月了，即使满脸印，他们也无怨无悔，这就是白衣天使，中国的医护人员。他们也为人子女，为人父母，但国家有难，他们义无反顾的奋战一线。这就是中国医者。哪有什么岁月静好，只不过是有人在为你负重前行说得便是这般吧。
“停课不停学”也扎实进行，为人师者，早已为学子做好榜样：网课进行的井井有条，更有甚者，老师亲自走上七尺讲台。他们蜡烛般的奉献，只为照亮学子前行。这就是中国教师。
一鲸落，万物生。一头鲸将时，会找一个安静的地方慢慢去，同时，它的尸体将供养这片海域的生命长达百年，科学家将这一过程称作鲸落。而今无数鲸一般的人涌出“水面”，他们无私的精神值得我们深深地致敬，同时，我们更该像他们那般，拥有无私奉献，勇于奉献的精神。
这就是中国的样子，你什么样，中国就什么样。让14亿人都成为你的样子，我们就能在春暖花开之时，看到你脱下防护服、揭开口罩露出灿烂的笑容。
“愿春早来，花枝春满，山河无恙，人间皆安”。我们经历过无数次的严寒，每一次，也都迎来了春天。我相信这次也一定会。
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【六】
在大家喜迎2020年，张灯结彩的时候，迎来的不是过年的欢声笑语，而是冠状肺炎病毒的蔓延。触目惊心的数字与日俱增，四千、五千、一万，每增一点都牵动着国人的心。
磨难压不垮、奋起正当时。在举国上下万众一心、众志成城做好新冠肺炎疫情防控工作的特殊时刻。
灾情就是命令，防疫就是责任。“白衣天使”是战“疫”一线“最美逆行者”，他们舍小家为大家，义无反顾地奔赴疫情防控一线，用专业的医疗技术与病毒抢时间，用强大的责任心守护着每一个病人的生命安全。
总有一种力量激励我们前行，总有一种精神让我们泪流满面，自新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情发生以来，亿万中华儿女万众一心，众志成城，共克时艰，战“疫”路上的一个个“好人”，一件件“好事”走进我们的视野，他们的事迹，他们的名字……感动着我们，凝聚起社会正能量，号召着我们必有信心和决心打赢这场疫情防控阻击战。我们普通人虽不能亲临主战场，但我们能坚持在大战中坚定信心、明确了理想，今后的岁月定将不负韶华。
虽然新型冠状病毒肺炎来势汹汹，给我们的生活蒙上了厚厚的阴影。但是作为学生的我们，作为社会主义的接班人，要把这次的疫情当作学习的机会，去学习前辈们这种处变不惊，舍己为人的精神，我们要利用好这个机会，静下心来想一想自己的人生规划，树立正确的人生观，价值观，把我们的祖国建设得更加强大，是我们每个人的使命。
另外，还要学会如何做好防护措施：
第一、尽量不出门，如果必须要去公共场所记得佩戴口罩。
第二、要勤洗手。
第三、不要过度疲劳，这样会降低免疫力。
不能吃野味，从自己做起，从每一个家庭做起，没有买卖，就没有伤害。
最后为逆行的勇士祈福，愿平安归来！中国加油！
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【七】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
新冠肺炎作文素材大学英文【八】
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester ’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily. ” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.”
What ’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
