上大学值得吗英文作文【一】
万物生长靠太阳，是啊！要是没有你——大自然，一切生物就停止了生长，人生活需要阳光、空气与大地等等，这都离不开你，你是我们生活的家园，农民伯伯中的靠土地，我们呼吸靠氧气，海上航行要有海洋……这些都是大自然——你的功劳，可现在却有一些人在破坏你的美，乱砍滥伐使你漂亮的绿衣变得残缺，乱扔垃圾使你变得丑陋不堪，制造工业垃圾使你变得简直让人认不出来。我真替你难过，不过我也不能只是纸上谈兵，我也要拿出点实际行动，来报答你对我十多年来提供的丰富用品，我会再也不乱扔垃圾，先从自身做起，然后再提醒别人，可是单凭我自己的努力是不够的，我与这世界上的人一定能再还你以前的美丽容貌的。
上大学值得吗英文作文【二】
在这个世界上不孤单，就是因为有你们这些，我的好朋友陪着我，在我有事的时候毫无埋怨的帮我，在我生病时，无微不至的照顾我，虽然我有时会与你们有何不来的地方，但大多数你们会让我有家人般的温暖，我有时在想这种温暖的感觉是什么，这时才发现，这就是友情呀。友情是纯真的，像天上的白云一样纯洁；友情是温暖的，像在寒冷的时候送来的一小把火焰；友情是烂漫的，就像在草坪上大步的奔跑时的那种心情。友情是一汪清泉，就算再邪恶的人也会被这清泉洗净心灵，有友情的地方，才是最温暖的地方。
上大学值得吗英文作文【三】
古训：“万般皆下品，唯有读书高”，曾在古代盛行，现在的时代不是不需要这样的古训了，而是在“唯有读书高”这句上，我个人在思想观念上存在一些想法。
当代大学生“上大学存在风险”，不是你上了大学就进入了保险箱，也不是你今后的前程光芒一片，只能说是你为今后谋得更好的前程增加了一个法码罢了。当今社会“就业形势”不是已证了此事了吗？比如，扩招之后，各所大学都在扩招本土及外地生源，好象一夜之间，中国的大地上一下子就都成了高级知识分子似了，什么硕士、博士等等人们都在学历上增长，在学时上有待考究。专科、本科学历的“大学生”好象是小学生水平，在就业市场上好象难谋到理想的职业，现在不是有的大学毕业生在竟聘“卖猪肉”的职位吗？这不就是“上大学存在风险”的真实版本吗？如果你不上大学，只有初中或高中文化水平“卖猪肉”不就可以了吗？何必投入那么多精力、财力，最终还得回到残酷的现实中来与那些生活底层的人们争职位？现如今不得不让我重新审视读大学的风险，这就是我想到的“上大学存在风险”的观点。
初看这是对大学生人生观、价值观、世界观的否定，细想一想，其实不是这样的，从现实生活中的大学生择业上看，我的观点从某种意义上讲是有些道理的。
我个人认为也有的单位重学历，轻水平的也不乏有之。学历层次的递增是件好事，但不能只停留在原有的工作水平上，而是真正能成为学历与自身素质同时提升，更不能在学术上搞“天下学术是一家，你评我我评他，最终评的是一家”上，学术上，搞形式与内容的脱节更不可取。让风险也应存在于学术领域，让真正有学问的`人为祖国出更多的学术精品。
有的学生虽是投入金钱，为的是求得功名，到三至几年求得了博、硕毕业证，有工作单位的还好，回到原有单位会要求相应的待遇。苦了那些还在路上狂热的大学生们。
最让人们担心的是今天的就业形势，那就是大学毕业生遍地开花，有的大学毕业生又重新拿起书本，在向更广更深的知识层面进发，最终能否修成正果，读书风险是否在加大未知。也有的大学生先选择了不理想的就业岗位，先择业后选岗位这是当代大学生的明智性的选择。普通的大学生毕业后就面临失业的大有人在，是现实的无奈还是读大学的风险在加码呢？不得而知。
现在有的大学生虽然大学毕业了，最起码的个人简历都不会书写，更谈不上专业知识能力的潜在危机了，虽说是时代变了，但知识能力没有风险呀，投入越多收益越多吗？多数学校是盲目招生，学生到校后，不能得到良好的教育，读大学生风险不是不存在，而是先投入风险，后收获成功的喜悦。
综上所述，“上大学存在风险”是实实在在存在的，最后让我们的大学生在“风险”中前行，道路虽是曲折的，前途是光明的，让我们伴着国家发展的希望曙光，在人生的决择中，大学生都有一个好的前程、好的归宿。
上大学值得吗英文作文【四】
上大学值得吗英文作文【五】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
