关于友谊英文作文大学【一】
读完了《简爱》，我知道这是一个十分艰巨的过程。这连住的几日，我几乎除了吃饭和睡觉，一切时间都耗费在这本来自遥远国度的小说里。然而我还得在抱怨的同时，不得不承认它的杰出与迷人。很少见到这样迷人的异国风情。这充满着英国十九世纪趣味的故事里，让我感慨了很多。其实我应该早些接触这本书，早就有很多的人介绍它了。可惜，我拥有着一点排外的情愫，一直拖到现在去欣赏它，实在有些相见恨晚。
作为一个中国人，我对英国人的思维和宗教信仰有点难以适应。不过呢，人世间的真情多数是相通的。每当我读到小简爱因为无亲无故而遭受虐待和歧视时，心中顿起的怜悯之情真让人难忘；每当简爱一次次化险为夷让我多么兴奋；当她勇敢地拒绝了圣约翰的求婚而坚持自己心中的真爱时，多么令鼓舞和震撼；特别在文章最后，她抛弃一切去照顾那位可怜的爱德华时，我的心中欣慰与感动迸发而出。
关于这本小说，我想它最大的成功之处就是它在很多艺术方面的杰出融合。我敢确信这本书的作者是一位多才多艺的作家。首先，她在描绘风景时，是以一个画家的审美角度去鉴赏，以一个画家情趣去把握光和影的和谐。读中国的小说很少见到这样细腻的风景描写的词汇。应该要感谢这本书的译者周令本的深厚的国文功底，使译本文采熠熠，令原著生辉。其次，夏落蒂。波郎特在语言学上的造诣也很深厚，作为一名英国人，作者可以说至少精通三种以上的外国语言。在读这本书的时候，我感觉自己可以通过它感受到整个欧洲的文化氛围。比方说英国人的自豪感和绅士风味，德国的大国气氛以及法国女性的天生浪漫情趣。甚至还读出了英国人那种殖民主义的歧视东方人的心理，比如他们称印度是个野蛮的民族。再次，夏落蒂。波郎特对感情戏的处理上，可以称得上很高明。她的主人公很少是一见钟情，这比较现实，但是她赋予的爱情总是在默无声息深入到读者的心田里。如此巧妙的感情戏，让我很意外，很惊喜。
《简爱》的作者如果和中国的曹雪芹相比，毫无疑问，后者的文化底蕴要更博深一些。就像中国和英国人拼比历史，中国人可以无愧地说：我比你老的多。曹雪芹一生所学要比夏落蒂。波郎特要广博的多，毕竟中国的文化底蕴要丰盛的多。中肯的说，简爱的确比不上中国的《红楼梦》。不管是人物丰富还是物致的描绘上，《红楼梦》都是更为杰出的。但是，《简爱》中也有值得中国人去学习和欣赏的地方。比方说，《简爱》对人物的心理描写方面，可以说淋漓尽致。这点在很多中国人的文学作品中做的都不够。
读这本书我仿佛读了一遍《圣经》，西方人对宗教笃深的感情与真诚的信仰，真很令人敬佩。现在的中国是一个缺乏信仰的时代。在读《简爱》时候，让我感受到在拥有宗教哺育下才可以得到的人情的纯美，在现在的中国这真的很难得。其实，很多圣经里的教诲与中国的孔儒的经典思想是相通互补，而现在国人却往往忽视了祖先的睿智。比如圣经里劝人从善，劝人宽忍，劝人感恩，与孔老夫子劝国人礼义仁，两者是相同的。在读《简爱》的时候，我时常被圣经里的美好的思想启迪着，让我联想到中国的现状，心中似乎收获许多。让我坚信，对于中国的儒家文化真的需要重新审视。
关于友谊英文作文大学【二】
有一种默契叫心有灵犀，有一种感觉叫妙不可言，有一种幸福叫与你相伴。这说的大概便是友谊吧！
我感谢这＂默契＂。当你在生活、学习中迷失了方向，迷茫中向着任意一点前进时，她却在前方等着你，这心灵的默契促使你与她相遇，重新找回了失去的自信。所以，我感谢这“默契”。
我享受这“感觉”。人生岂能一帆风顺？正如汪国真所说的，“人生从来不是只有辉煌。”当你碰钉子时，有她陪在你身边，不住地安慰你，一句句贴心的话语修复着你受伤的心灵。你一遍又一遍地向她诉说着委屈，她却是一次又一次地聆听。当你被荣誉、赞扬冲晕头脑，她却时时提醒你，千万不可自满得意，让你一回又一回地认识到了错误，从而躲过了自负后的惨痛教训。当她因一次小失误而被老师批评后，你是否忍不住上前安慰？看着她红红的眼眶，是否心中无限失落？这种感觉有酸也有甜，我享受这酸甜的感觉。
我向往这“幸福”。我希望能与她永远相随相伴，在与她嬉笑玩乐间，我感受到了友情，知道了除亲情之外的情感，我的生活因有了她而变得丰富充实，多姿多彩。
友谊像一朵带刺的玫瑰，而每一朵玫瑰却都会有刺，正因为它并不完美，与她相处才有滋有味，淌若剔掉这刺，便失去了对它应有的尊重。
关于友谊英文作文大学【三】
Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant. Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in poss ession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughte rs. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our
society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.
关于友谊英文作文大学【四】
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that.some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The
Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
Last morning, when tiding my bookshelf, I took this book out of the shelf, and a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. a dried flower flew away from the book. It was pale blue, very transparent, with thin fine veins. I held it against the morning light and blew on it. The soft breeze carried it away. Camille is just like the camellia, she could never escape from the destiny of withering. But it wasn’t her fault; it’s because of the evil of Capitalism and the hideousness of that society.
Suddenly, I remembered a saying: “Women are like the flowers”. Those pretty women are like those beautiful flowers; their delicate beauty makes people feel they are the miracle of life. However, even the God envies their beauty. It seems that beautiful women always have tragic endings. As we are normal persons, even we can see the hideousness of humanity that results in their fate of withering, we can at most ask quietly in our hearts: Where have those beautiful flowers gone? Where have they gone?
The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe
It seemed to be such a coincidence that the night after I finished reading The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe, I was to dine in a restaurant distinctly related to the book itself. This restaurant was no other than the famous American-styled “Friday ’s. ” The reason for mentioning this restaurant is quite straightforward to all the gentlemen, ladies and children who have read the novel and enjoyed it, which is the fact that this restaurant was, most likely, named after the American Native in Robinson Crusoe, called Friday. This restaurant offers very exceptional service, for instance when the waitresses are asked to order dishes they kneel rather than stand, which, unlike the other restaurants I have been to, makes it easier for the customers to hear them speak. Moreover, Friday’s friendly services to the customers help them to make better choices when ordering dishes. I remembered when I went to Friday ’s last time; the waitress kindly described the items on the menu with precise details. It turned out that the combo I initially wanted was designed to be shared among a large group, not to be eaten by one person. I think this restaurant shows many commendable features similar to that of Friday. Friday brought emotional warmth to the people around him with his appealing personality. I think it was this personality that affected Crusoe and made him say that he loved Friday when Crusoe didn ’t express love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. “When he espied me, he came running to me, laying himself down again upon the ground, with all the possible signs of an humble, thankful disposition, making many antic gestures to show it to let me know how he would serve me as long as he lived.” This was what Friday did after Crusoe had rescued him from the two savages chasing him. It was easy for me to see why Crusoe had loved Friday. After sometime, Crusoe and Friday were to rescue Friday’s father. When Friday reunited with his father, the scene was easy to move anyone: “It would have moved anyone to tears to have seen how Friday kissed him, embraced him, hugged him, cried, laughed, halloed, jumped about, danced,
sung; and then sung and jumped about again, like a distracted creature. It was a good while before I could make him speak to me.” This is my favourite chapter in the whole book. It is hard to see why Friday is an ex-savage when he can have personalities more praiseworthy than many civilized people, viz. Crusoe himself. “When he (Friday went to him (Friday’s father, he would sit down by him, open his breast, and hold his father’s head close to his bosom, half an hour together, to nourish it; then he took his arms and ankles, which were numbed and stiff with the binding, and rubbed them with his hands.” Furthermore, Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does.
Crusoe, on the absolute contrary, seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his account of leaving his family—he never shows any emotions. After a moving lecture from Robinson’s father about his future, he still decided to follow his own wandering ambition. Careless was he about the wishes of his parents to keep him alive and prosperous, as he was the only child left in the family. When he came back from the island which he had lived on for twenty eight years, he found that it had been too late to tell his parents that he was still alive, but yet again he did not feel sorry for them; he also did not feel sorry for the two people who had to live in misery for nearly thirty years under the allusion all of their sons were dead. He had the same feelings for his wife: when he was married, he said it was “not either to my disadvantage or dissatisfaction”, implying that it was also neither to his advantage nor his satisfaction. Moreover, after his wife died, Robinson did not think of looking after the three children they had, but went back to the island, which he had lived on for twenty-eight years. It was on this trip which Robinson Crusoe revisited “His Island ” as he called it. I feel that Robinson ’s indifference to his family is almost emotionally cruel.
Before had clearly shown the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, displayed far more emotion toward his family members than Crusoe, whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again. I think Defore is very successful in introducing Friday as part of the novel, it makes the whole novel seem much more complete and gripping to the reader, as well as proving that Defoe’s ideology of racism is civilized unlike many other Europeans at that time; natives and savages are not worse than others but can perhaps even be more modern and civilized. Those are the reasons of why I like The Life And Adventures Of Robinson Crusoe and Friday.
关于友谊英文作文大学【五】
作为传统文化的先祖，孟子于中国的影响是达数千年之长远，我辈中人自然难以三言两语以揽括，虽然我的认识只是管锥之见，但孟子本人的思想、精神和气魄却如穿透万里晴空的红日，我即使局限于视野和眼识，亦已感到了耀眼的光芒。
首先，我觉得孟子的厉害处正在于，所提倡的'“仁义”思想最能抓住事物的本质要害。孟子看到“生”、“利”是对事物利益关系的短视，而仁、义却能长远影响到未来，故有“舍生取义”、“舍利取义”之说。狭义的“仁义”是指封建时代人伦的忠义孝悌，实则是千百年来对孟子的误解，因为从五四新文化运动以来，三纲五伦已革了命；《中庸》讲：“道不可须臾离也，可离非道也。”那末，此“仁义”还有永恒的意义可言吗？所以我们今天理解孟子的“仁义”，实应站在高处，从广义入手：如同道家的“道”、佛家的“菩提”，都是对客观普遍规律的认识，孟子的“仁义”也不二致。而这种认识，可让孟子如一熟练渔夫的手钳在了螃蟹扼要的部位，任螃蟹用力再猛，纵有大腿大脚亦是摆脱不了。无论事物表象出现多么错综复杂的问题或困难，孟子皆显得不昏沉也不散乱，经常化险为夷、转难为易，而绰绰有余。
孟轲的文字，已经是论点论据俱全，长于说理，不若《论语》般读整书方知逻辑，也不若《道德经》玄妙牵强，读起来萌化感比较强。《孟子》最吸引我的地方就是先从一般事物说起，再慢慢引出道理，让别人不知不觉间承认自己的错误。孟子说：“我的力气足以举起三千斤的东西，却举不起一片羽毛；我的视力足以看清秋天野兽毫毛的尖端，却看不见一车子的柴禾。大王会相信这话吗？”话中所说的显然不符合常理。宣王说：“不会。”孟子说：“显然，一片羽毛举不起来，是因为不肯用力气；一车的柴禾看不见，是因为不肯用目力；百姓不被您爱抚，是因为不肯施恩德啊。所以大王未能做到用仁德统一天下，是不去做，而不是不能做啊。”就这样，孟子让君主认识到自己的错误。比起直话直说的谏臣，孟子所说的让至高无上的君主更容易接受。道理层层递进，就像是设下了圈套，一步一步地让人不知不觉走进去。
当今著名于世界的“系统论”、“系统思考”，虽口口声声反对舍本逐末，而要动态、长远地看事情，说透了：皆可从孟子的仁义思想找到雏形。用毛泽东的话“干振而枝披，将麾而卒舞”，以形容孟子的仁义之道最为恰当不过了。而抓不到仁义精髓的人，有如行走在茫茫沙漠或海洋上，终生疲命于随时浮现的海市蜃楼的追逐中去。
另有一点，我觉得孟子最值得后人效仿的是他独行特立，不同流合污的气概。这点即注定了他若有机会作为，给予一发挥才干的舞台，则必能成一王业的大人物也！独行特立者，立场坚定，意识独立；不同流合污者，则能做到不见异思迁、不心随物转。有此二者，则造就了孟子之大气魄，表现在文风上则气势雄奇而磅礴，用来创业则整个世界都向他一人倾倒，孙子兵法言“致人而不致于人”，在孟子身上得到了体现。当今社会形势风起云涌，常常人置于其中而莫辩方向，倘学得孟子一二，何怕不能惊天地而泣鬼神呢？
虽然研习《孟子》的时间短促，然而孟子光明的仁义之道已足以令人受益终生了，最后，再对孟子的仁义之道作一总结：一是其舍末逐本的思想，二是其独行特立的精神，三是其驾驭形势的气魄。
关于友谊英文作文大学【六】
Is it good for students to do some housework
Secondly， to do some housework can keep you healthy and strong ，some hard housework can be regarded as a kind of physical exercise。
Finally， to do some housework can share your parents’ work 。They must be happy if you say” Have a rest ，and I will do the housework”
So I think it is good for students to do some housework。
这是好学生做一些家务其次，做一些家务能够让你保持健康和强壮，一些硬家务可以看作是一种体育锻炼。
最后，做一些家务可以分享您的父母的工作。他们必须高兴，如果你说“休息一下，我会做家务”因此，我认为这是为学生好做一些家务。
关于友谊英文作文大学【七】
“友谊”这个字眼在我心中是很纯洁的，它的上面不能染上一丝的污垢，因为真正的友谊毕竟给我们带来了许多妙不可言的感觉。
当你失败的.时候，朋友会第一个伸出手，拉你走出困境，让你的心情逐渐转好。朋友是肯定会安慰你，鼓舞你，支持你的，因为在他（她）们看来，你们二人就像一个人，你难过，他也难过。但是，他（她）们的表现方式却不一定是一样的，或许，他（她）们会拼命的讲笑话，逗你开心；或许，他（她）们会默默的走在旁边，替你长吁短叹，帮你分忧解难；或许，他（她）们会不动声色的远远的跟在你后面，皱着眉头看着你，让你一个人冷静一下。不管他（她）们是如何表示的，他（她）们都只有一个目标，让你的心情好起来。所以你不能误以为他（她）们幸灾乐祸、虚情假意、冷漠无情，不然，他（她）们岂不是太冤枉了么？
同样在你得志的时候，首先向你祝贺的还是朋友，他（她）们会为你开心，为你欢乐，为你笑。但是他们不会一味的捧着你，当你骄傲的时候，朋友会来提醒你，帮你一步一步的走下骄傲的高云头，以免你狠狠的摔了下来。试问，这个时候你能说他（她）们是羡慕你，嫉妒你吗？如果他（她）们那么真诚的笑脸都被你误会的话，那我也只能说你是“身在福中不知福”了。
现在我经常听见有的同学叹息：我的身边没有一个朋友！我的朋友都好虚伪！我真的和“友谊”无缘吗？我好渴望友谊！我想，听了他们的话，你可能为他（她）们而伤心，其实在我看来，他们说出了这种话，就已经证明了他们根本不懂如何得到友谊，说确切一点，他们根本的不知道什么是友谊！真正的“友谊”是一株小小的幼苗，只要双方精心的呵护，这株小苗才能逐渐的生根、发芽，慢慢的长大，而不只是口头上说“我要维护友谊！”等，如果是这样，我想那棵小苗会很快的夭折的！我认为经常把“友谊”挂在嘴边的人，是不懂友谊的，也是得不到真正的友谊的！
所以，朋友，拥有友谊是一份幸福，一定要把握住这份属于你自己的幸福，只要在心中默默的珍惜它就行了，请记住，一定要精心的守护它，不要让它逝去，相信你会拥有更多的好朋友，得到更多的快乐！
