中国人的消费观念英语作文【一】
The bicycle is the most popular means of transportation in China. China is a country “on bicycle wheels”。 People ride them for various purposes such as going to and from school and work. Bicycles are very cheap and easy to buy in China.
There are many advantages to riding a bicycle. First， using a bicycle can greatly help reduce the air pollution in many big cities. Second， people can improve their health by riding a bicycle.
The future of bicycle will be bright. In some European countries， city governments have arranged pedestrians to use “public bicycles” to travel round the city center free of charge.
中国人的消费观念英语作文【二】
gathering nearly all the well-known chinese original cartoon characters, ne zha, monkey sun and zhu bajie, the top three cartoon characters voted by kids, will lead acting in this dream fairyland and experience an outer space journey by spacecraft named °chang e±. including big-face cat, piggy bear and other nearly 20 characters will be joining this journey. a cartoon olympic game is on schedule as well, and the main difficulty they confront is how to ignite the torch on the pate of giraffe.
this smash show from cctv gathered a top line-up in chinese drama and cartoon field. top producers for screenwriting, choreography, casting, lighting and music devoted their talents here. lead acted by liu xiao ling tong and ma de hua, who are well-known for their excellent performance in tv series °journey to the west±, while notable children programs presiders as ju ping, dong hao, jin guizi and etc also join this sweet play with their specific role. cute characters, fantastic plot will endow kids a memorable hilarious night!
中国人的消费观念英语作文【三】
无过错责任，垄断资本主义时期各种社会问题日益突出，工业损害，环境污染，产品致损等现象大量存在，传统的过错原则使此类侵权难以举证和认定，为了使受害人能够得到合理的补偿，出现了所谓的无过错责任，即在特定的情况下，即使行为人没有过错，也要承担损害赔偿责任。但这里有一个逻辑上的悖论：在行为人没有过错时，我们以什么理由要求他承担责任呢？事实上，无过错责任只是立法者对特殊情况的一种技术处理：一方面，此类情况出现频率高，过错举证困难，不给受害人以补偿有违公平；另一方面，此类过错专业行强，难以抽象出共同的标准，不以过错为要件也是效率的要求。况且，无过失并非指行为本身无过失，而是不以确定的过失为侵权行为构成要件，而不以过失为要件的原因不是对过失的否定，只是法律已形成对过失的推定，所以不必再去考虑过失的具体形式。[15]
严格地说，无过错责任并不能作为一种归责原则与过错责任并列。其真正作用不是解决责任的归属，而是解决损失的分担。其在立法上的表现也以列举式的规定出现，事实上也 是作为了过错责任的例外情况。由于侵权行为法是将法律调整的视野局限在一对一的责任归属争执之中。所以，当依侵权法的过错归责一方不应承担责任，而另一方又确属无辜并值得同情时，无法找到一个两全其美的办法。这在工业事故上表现尤其明显。受私法公法化理论影响，既然社会选择了工业化，受益于工业化，那么由社会承担损害后果也是理所应当。用王卫国教授的话说，致损风险是工业化的必然成本。[16]既然只是为了分配损失，那就必然要选择有能力承担损失的人，即所谓的“大钱袋（deep pocket）”理论。因为它们不仅本身有负担能力，更重要的是，它们有提供保险金的能力，即将损失分担社会化。这样，就有效弥补了侵权行为法自身的缺陷。但无过错的适用必须限定在一定范围内，特别是不宜适用于自然人之间的侵权行为。因为这会导致人们对自己的行为感到无所适从：不知道如何才能不承担责任。而当履行义务的成本过高时，往往会走向它的反面-不履行任何注意义务。这就如同一座设置不合理的人行天桥，为了方便人们甘冒风险。
